Egypt: Human Rights Organizations “Closed”
Due to
Implementation of New Law on Associations
NEW YORK - The Egyptian government is using a new law to stifle
public debate and restrict the development of human rights groups
and other independent civil society organizations, the Lawyers Committee
warned today.
The law, known as
the Law of Associations, Law 84 of 2002, required all non-governmental
organizations to register with the government by June 5, 2003. Already
the registration of two well established independent human rights
organizations - the New Women’s Research Center and
the Land Center for Human Rights - have been rejected by the government.
“These denials of permission to register constitute effective
closure orders for these organizations,” said Neil Hicks Director
of the Lawyers Committee’s Human Rights Defenders Project.
“If they continue to operate without permission the staff
of these organizations, their members and their boards of directors
will be at risk of prosecution and possible imprisonment simply
for exercising their right to form an association to promote and
protect human rights.”
Human rights organizations are particularly at risk under the new
law because their work often involves exposing government involvement
in human rights violations, and criticizing government policies.
Such activities inevitably result in friction between these organizations
and some government officials. Nevertheless, the activities of independent
human rights defenders are an essential element of any democratic
society. Their work makes it possible for government officials,
and others, to be held accountable for their actions that have an
impact on human rights conditions.
In
a letter sent today to the Minister of Social Affairs, the
Lawyers Committee calls on the Egyptian government to reconsider
its decision to deny these applications for registration from internationally
respected human rights organizations. The government has a legitimate
interest in regulating the activities of non-governmental organizations,
but that should not give it the power to close organizations of
which it disapproves by administrative order.
|