Appeals Court Decision in Myrna Mack Case
a Step Backwards for Justice in Guatemala
NEW YORK - Guatemala’s Fourth Appeals Court (Sala
Cuarta de Apelaciones) today reversed the conviction of Colonel
Juan Valencia Osorio for the 1990 murder of anthropologist Myrna
Mack Chang. In October 2002, a trial court convicted and sentenced
Valencia Osorio to thirty years imprisonment for his role in orchestrating
the killing of Myrna Mack, the first time that a senior military
officer was convicted for human rights violations committed during
Guatemala’s 36-year civil war. His two co-defendants—General
Augosto Godoy Gaitán and Colonel Juan Guillermo Oliva Carrera—were
acquitted by the trial court and the Fourth Appeals Court today
also upheld their acquittals.
Myrna Mack was killed outside her Guatemala City office in 1990,
in retaliation for her groundbreaking research exposing the devastating
impact of counter insurgency tactics on indigenous communities in
Guatemala. In 1993, Noel de Jesús Beteta Álvarez,
a soldier from an elite presidential security unit (known as the
EMP), was convicted for carrying out the murder and his superior
officers were subsequently charged for their role in bringing it
about. In its October 3, 2024 decision following the trial of these
three superior officers, the trial court accepted that Mack was
targeted by the army for political reasons, that she had been categorized
as an “internal enemy” due to her work, and that she
had been subjected to surveillance by the army prior to her assassination.
The majority of the court found that Valencia Osorio had ordered
Beteta Álvarez to kill Mack, but did not find sufficient
evidence to connect Godoy Gaitán and Oliva Carrera to the
murder.
On October 16, 2002, the public prosecutor and the victim’s
sister, Helen Mack (as private accuser), filed appeals briefs against
the two acquittals. Valencia Osorio also appealed his conviction.
The Fourth Appeals Court heard oral arguments from the parties on
April 23, 2003. A Lawyers Committee observer attended both the April
hearing and the reading of today’s decision. The appeals decision
was read out this afternoon in a courtroom packed with observers
and amid tight security. After dismissing all of the points of appeal
raised by both the prosecution and Valencia Osorio, the court put
forward its own position that there was an inconsistency in the
trial court decision with regard to the role of the EMP and the
responsibility of Valencia Osorio. It therefore substituted an acquittal
for his conviction.
“The decision of the appeals court is a huge step backwards
for accountability for human rights violations in Guatemala,”
commented Neil Hicks, Director of the Lawyers Committee’s
Human Rights Defenders Project. “It once again demonstrates
the inability of the Guatemalan justice system to effectively address
serious crimes committed by the military.” Hicks further described
the decision as “the worst case scenario, raising questions
about the impartiality of the court.”
Helen Mack has condemned the decision and stated her intention
to further appeal to the Supreme Court, using the cassation procedure
provided for under Guatemalan law. “Given that they are no
longer in detention, it is likely that the defendants will fall
into their old patterns of seeking to delay the proceedings,”
stated Hicks.
|